عنوان مقاله [English]
Today, various rural projects, such as nomadic unification and the provision of various technical and organizational innovations in villages, are being implemented, and the reaction of the public to them and the acceptance or non-acceptance of these plans are one of the important issues of the day. In this regard, culture is an important factor in accepting or not accepting these ideas in rural environments. Therefore, the role of cultural engineering in solving possible problems is important for rural experts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impotence of cultural engineering in villages as part of the rural development process. At first, a definition of cultural engineering and its relation to development are presented. I am referring to the history of cultural engineering in the countryside and to mention the countries of China, the Soviet Union, the Quds and Shakalat regime of Iran as examples. It is pointed out that in cultural villages cultural institutions are created by creating cultural institutions, changing cultural patterns and, in some cases, eliminating them in order to accept or optimize the use of innovations. At the same time solving the problems caused by rural inequality and migration is one of the tasks of cultural engineering. It is pointed out that in a rural cultural program, attention must be paid to the purpose, time, cost and financial resources, and the elements of participation, objectivity, and integrated management are of great importance. Finally, it is pointed out that cultural engineering A top-down approach that can be implemented in a macro or local dimension, such as a village.