Geography and Human Relationships

Geography and Human Relationships

A Comparative Analysis of Residential Complex Design Principles with an Emphasis on Children's Mental Health in Iranian Architecture

Document Type : thesis

Authors
1 Islamic Azad University, Pardis Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Pardis Branch, Islamic Azad University
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Pardis Branch, Islamic Azad University.
10.22034/gahr.2024.492257.2318
Abstract
Introduction and Objective: Considering the critical importance of children's mental health and the impact of residential environments on it, this research provides a comparative analysis of design principles for residential complexes in traditional and modern Iranian architecture. In today's world, addressing children's psychological needs and creating suitable spaces for their growth and development are recognized as social and cultural priorities. Residential space design should not only fulfill physical needs but also contribute to the mental and social well-being of children. The primary goal of this study is to examine the effects of open and green spaces, shared spaces, appropriate lighting and ventilation, and the use of natural materials and colors in residential complex design on children's mental health. By identifying the strengths and weaknesses of these two architectural approaches, this study aims to propose solutions for improving modern designs.

Methodology: This research employs both qualitative and quantitative methods, including a review of scientific literature, field studies of traditional and modern residential complexes, and interviews with experts and architects. Data are presented descriptively and analytically.

Findings: The findings indicate that open and green spaces in traditional designs enhance physical activity and reduce stress in children, whereas their scarcity in modern architecture leads to decreased activity levels and increased psychological tension. Additionally, shared spaces in traditional designs foster social interactions and communication skills, aspects that are often neglected in modern architecture. Furthermore, natural lighting, materials, and soft color palettes positively impact children's mental health.

Conclusion: The results of this study underscore the importance of integrating traditional design principles into modern architecture. Architects are encouraged to incorporate open and green spaces, shared spaces, natural lighting, and natural materials in residential complex designs to enhance children's mental health.
Keywords
Subjects

1)     برک، لورا ای. (1384). روانشناسی رشد، ترجمه سید یحیی محمدی، نشر ارسباران، تهران.
2)     بهاروند، شکوفه. «بررسی و بازبینی مفهوم شهر دوستدار کودک از مشارکت‌سازی کودکان تا استانداردهای طراحی؛ با ارائة راهکارهای اجرایی و راهبردی»، در نشریه مدیریت شهری، ش 34 (بهار 1393)، ص 297-322.
3)     جلیلی، محمد و علیرضا عینی‌فر و غلامرضا طلیسچی. «فضای باز مجموعه‌های مسکونی و پاسخ‌دهی محیطی؛ مطالعة تطبیقی سه مجموعة مسکونی در شهر همدان»، درنشریه هنرهای زیباـ معماری و شهرسازی، دورة 18، ش 4 (زمستان 1392)، ص 57-68.
4)     حسینی، آرزو، صالحی نیا، مجید، شفایی، مینو، و صالح صدق پور، بهرام. (1400). اصول طراحی عرصه ی میانی مجتمع های مسکونی برای انگیزش بازی کودک. صفه، 31(92 )، 69-82. https://sid.ir/paper/384190/fa
5)     ساسانی، مژگان و علیرضا عینی‌فر و حسین ذبیحی. «تحلیل رابطة بین کیفیت فضای میانی و کیفیت‌های انسانی‌ـ محیطی؛ مورد پژوهی: مجتمع‌های مسکونی شهر شیراز»، در نشریه هنرهای زیباـ معماری و شهرسازی، دورة 21، ش 2 (تابستان 1395)، ص 69-80.
6)     سجادی قائم‌مقامی، پروین‌السادات و شهرام پوردیهیمی و اسماعیل ضرغامی. «اصول پایداری اجتماعی در مجتمع‌های مسکونی از دید جامعة صاحب‌نظران و متخصصان ایرانی»، در صفه، ش 51 (پاییز و زمستان 1389)، ص 75-87.
7)     صادق صابری، محمدجواد، قدرجانی، راضیه، و حاجیان زیدی، مهرداد. (1395). طراحی فضای کنش اجتماعی کودکان در محوطه باز مجتمع های مسکونی با رویکرد خلاقیت و تعاملات اجتماعی. شباک، 2(6 (پیاپی 13) (جلد 4 مطالعات هنر و معماری))، 13-27.. https://sid.ir/paper/504568/fa
8)     عظمتی، حمیدرضا، و فریدون زاده، حسن. (1392). مدلیابی ساختاری رضایت مندی کودکان از فضاهای باز مجتمع های مسکونی. علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، 15(4 (مسلسل 59))، 107-117. https://sid.ir/paper/392860/fa
9)     قاضی زاده، ندا. (1390). تاثیر طراحی فضای باز مسکونی در ایجاد حس دلبستگی به مکان. پایان نامه دکتری. راهنما امیر سعید محمودی. دانشگاه تهران.
10)  کیافر، طاهر. (1399) اصول طراحی فضای باز مجتمع مسکونی برای دستیابی ساکنان به سطح احساسی «حضور در مکان». رساله دکتری. استاد راهنما مجید صالحی نیا، سید باقر حسینی. دانشگاه هنر اصفهان.
11)  مک اندرو، فرانسیس. (1392). روا نشناسی محیطی. (غلامرضا محمودی، مترجم). تهران: وانیا. (نشر اثر اصلی 1993).
12) Acar, Habibe. (2014). Learning environments for children in outdoor spaces, procedia, 846-853.
13) Aghdasi, M. Fathirezaie, Z. Abbaspour, K. (2021). The Effect of Environmental Contexts from Ecological Perspective on Motor Development and Creativity of Children. Quarterly Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 8(2):157. doi: 10.3390/children8020157 .
14) Alexander, C. (1966). The City as a Mechanism for Sustaining Human Contact. University of California, Routledge.
15) Alizadeh Moghadam, S; Zakarian, M; Tashari, B. (2017).  Re-designing the pedestrian path with the approach of improving the quality of people's attendance in the historical context of Yazd city, case example: Farrokhi Street Pedestrian. Research and Urban Planning Journal, 9(34), 133-148 [In Persian]
16) Aram, F; Karai, F; Habibi, M. (2014). Investigating the role of green spaces on the presence of residents and increasing social interactions in neighborhoods with periodic markets, a case example: the daily markets of Hamedan city. Iranian Society of Architecture and Urban Planning, 8(13), 135-146 [In Persian]
17) Azizi, M. (2006). Sustainable residential area: a case study of Narmak. Fine arts magazine, 27(27), 35-46 [In Persian]
18) Bandar Abad, A. (2016). Comparative comparison of the concepts of "place" and "out of place" in the social development of the city from the point of view of environmental psychology. Social Development and Welfare Planning Quarterly, 8(32), 139-170 [In Persian]
19) Beletsik, G. (2007). Kindergarden Architecture. (saghafi, m & Basirian, S, Trans.) Esfahan, Iran, Khak Publishing.
20) Boxberger, K. Reimers, A.(2019). Parental Correlates of Outdoor Play in Boys and Girls Aged 0 to 12—A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health: 16(2), Doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020190.
21) Chang, Z., Wang, S., & Zhang, X. (2020). Seasonal variations in physical activity and sedentary behavior among preschool children in a Central China city. American Journal of Human Biology, 32(6), e23406.
22) Collins, A. Jodie, B. Cheryl, R. Thomas,K. (2020). Describing the Psychosocial Profile and Unmet Support Needs of Parents Caring for a Child with a Life-Limiting Condition: A Cross-Sectional Study of Caregiver-Reported Outcomes. Palliative Medicine, 34(3), 358-366.
23) Corsaro, W. A. (2020). Big ideas from little people: What research with children contributes to social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 83(1), 5-25.
24) Cosco, N. Moore, R.Islam, M.( 2010). Behavior Mapping: A Method for Linking Preschool Physical Activity and Outdoor Design. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 42(3): 513-519.
25) Dajliri, N; Kazemi, A; Nasri, R. (2018). Evaluation of architectural components effective on improving attendance in cultural-leisure complexes. 6th National Conference of Applied Researches in Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Management, Tehran, https://civilica.com/doc/927350  [In Persian]
26) Datar, A., Nicosia, N., & Shier, V. (2013). Parent perceptions of neighborhood safety and children's physical activity, sedentary behavior, and obesity: evidence from a national longitudinal study. American journal of epidemiology, 177(10), 1065-1073.
27) Downing, F. (2003). Transcending Memory: Remembrance and the Design of Place. Design Studies, collage of Architecture 24(3): 213–235.
28) Ergler, C. R., Freeman, C., & Guiney, T. (2020). Walking with preschool‐aged children to explore their local wellbeing affordances. Geographical Research, 59(1), 118-135.
29) Fisher,R. (2005). Teaching children to think, Cheltenham, Nelson Thomes.
30) Hinkley, T., Brown, H., Carson, V., & Teychenne, M. (2018). Cross sectional associations of screen time and outdoor play with social skills in preschool children. PloS one, 13(4), e0193700.
31) Marcus C, Sarkissian W. (1986). Housing As If People Mattered.site design gguidline for medium-density family housing. University of California press
32) Pang, W., Lu, Y., Long, H., Wang, Q., & Lin, L. (2020). Three-generational families: Are they beneficial to Chinese children’s creativity?. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100623.
33) Sallis JF, Bauman A, Pratt M. (1998). Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15: 379–397.
34) Sutton, E. p., Kem. (2002). Children As Partners In Neighborhood Place making: Lessons From Intergenerational Design charrettes, Environmental psychology ,Vol 22,171-189.
35) Syme S.L, Berkman L. (1976). Social class, susceptibility, and sickness. American Journal of Epicjemjoogylo,4(1):1-8.
Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 34
Summer 2026
Pages 895-912

  • Receive Date 04 December 2024
  • Revise Date 04 January 2025
  • Accept Date 05 February 2025