Geography and Human Relationships

Geography and Human Relationships

The Age of Conflicts: Geopolitical Turning Points – A Critical Analysis of Thierry de Montbrial’s Thought

Document Type : thesis

Authors
1 PhD student in political science, Shiraz University
2 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, Iran.
3 -Professor of Political Science, Paris Academy of Geopolitics, Paris. France
10.22034/gahr.2026.547831.2597
Abstract
Thierry de Montbrial, founder and President of the French Institute of International Relations (IFRI) since 1979, in his influential book The Age of Conflicts, seeks to construct an innovative framework for the study of international relations by linking classical geopolitical theories with the pressing challenges of the twenty-first century. Drawing on the intellectual legacies of Mackinder, Mahan, and Spykman, Montbrial expands the scope of analysis beyond state-centric paradigms to include economic, social, technological, and security dimensions, while emphasizing the enduring relevance of geographical determinants. His main contribution lies in combining historical reflection with forward-looking analysis, thereby providing multidimensional tools for interpreting contemporary dynamics such as the rise of non-state actors, hybrid threats, and shifting power alignments. Nevertheless, Montbrial’s approach is not without limitations: its predominant macro-level orientation risks underestimating the role of local actors, social movements, and cultural–identity factors in shaping conflict trajectories. From this perspective, The Age of Conflicts simultaneously functions as both a valuable guide to the complexities of modern geopolitics and a stimulus for critical debate and theoretical rethinking. Rather than offering closure, the work opens new avenues for inquiry into the uncertain future of global order.
Keywords
Subjects

·       رومی، فرشاد . (1401). تغییرات اقلیمی و پیامدهای آن بر امنیت ملی ایرانرهیافت‌های سیاسی و بین ‌المللی14(1), 203-228. doi: 10.29252/piaj.2022.228257.1280
·       سلیمی سبحان، محمدرضا و قادری،  فاطمه . (1403). تغییر اقلیم و تأثیر آن بر امنیت ملی و بین المللی ایران در هندسه نظم جدید جهانی. فصلنامه آماد و فناوری دفاعی, 7(1), 97-130.
·       Akinyetun, T. S., Bello, F. G., & Yusuf, A. L. (2024). Climate change and security in the Sahel: Challenges and responses. Environmental Security Review, 8(1), 33–50.
·       Baechler, G. (1998). Why environmental transformation causes violence: A synthesis. Environmental Change and Security Project Report, 4, 118–131.
·       Evans, A. (2010). Resource scarcity, climate change, and the risk of violent conflict. World Development, 38(3), 45–58.
·       F. Rogers, P. (2000). Politics in the next 50 years: The changing nature of international conflict.
·       Gal, S. (2016). Mountains and Conflict: Conflict as a Factor in Territorial Adaptation and Innovation.
·       Hafeznia, M. R., Alizadeh, A., & Kaviani Rad, M. (2013). Conceptual challenges in contemporary geopolitics: A critical analysis of theoretical integration. Geopolitics Quarterly, 9(2), 83–92.
·       Hafeznia, M. R., Mahdavi, D., & Hajiluie, M. (2013). Geopolitical Theories: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(2), 1–8.
·       Hauge, W., & Ellingsen, T. (1998). Beyond environmental scarcity: Causal pathways to conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 35(3), 299–317.
·       Irwin, R. (2014). Globalization as History.
·       Konaev, M. (2019). Urban warfare in the twenty-first century. International Security Studies, 24(2), 19–37.
·       Lambakis, S. (2004). Asymmetric warfare and American strategy. Parameters, 34(1), 2–13.
·       Liu, Y., Li, J., & Tang, X. (2019). The roles of non-state actors in global governance: A review. Journal of International Studies, 28(1), 9–17.
·       Mackinder, H. J. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, 23(4), 421–437.
·       Mahan, A. T. (1890). The influence of sea power upon history, 1660–1783. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1–32.
·       Marmorat, A. (2008). Les nouveaux acteurs de la scène internationale. Revue Internationale et Stratégique, 69(1), 91–103.
·       McFee, S., & Röders, R. (2023). Environmental decline and armed conflict: Complex pathways. Security Studies Quarterly, 17(2), 10–28.
·       Mello, A. (2016). Explaining victory and defeat in asymmetric wars. International Politics, 53(4), 413–428.
·       Montbrial, T. (1999). The role of scholars in policy and theory. International Affairs Review, 47(3), 22–27.
·       Montbrial, T. de (2019). Le nouveau siècle géopolitique. Paris: Editions Dunod, 119–130, 123.
·       Nadiruzzaman, M., & Scheffran, J. (2023). Climate change and security nexus. International Development Planning Review45(4), 345-349.
·       Orogbemi, O. (2021). Rethinking geopolitical theory: Non-state actors and world politics. Geopolitics Quarterly, 17(3), 131–140.
·       Real P. Sousa, R. (2018). The context of conflict resolution : international relations and the study of peace and conflict.
·       Reuber, P. (2000). Redefining Geopolitics: Geographical Discourses and Territorial Politics. Geopolitics, 5(1), 217–233.
·       Rosenberg, D., & Gonsalves, D. (2006). The evolving nature of asymmetric warfare. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 1(1), 15–29.
·       Savaş, E. (2024). Geopolitics in the Twenty-First Century: Revisiting Theories and Practices. International Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 1–16.
·       Tillotson, J., & Mustafa, S. (2020). The agency dilemma: Integrating human factors in conflict studies. Conflict Analysis Journal, 15(2), 35–42.
·       Wagner, R. (2010). Rethinking conflict theory: Paradigms and integration. International Relations Review, 19(4), 110–117.
·       Zakaria, N. (2012). Book Review – Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Political Theory.
Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 34
Summer 2026
Pages 521-538

  • Receive Date 17 September 2025
  • Revise Date 22 December 2025
  • Accept Date 18 February 2026