The main purpose of the research is to study the semantic understanding and interpretation of the personnel, employees and officials of the crisis management of Kohbanan city regarding earthquake crisis management and the factors affecting it based on the experiences of the 1396 Kohbanan earthquake.

Methods: The current research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive in terms of method and in terms of the type of study, it is a qualitative research based on the foundation data method. The statistical population includes all personnel, workers and crisis management officials of Koh Banan city. Sampling method Target is available. The participants in the research were 22 of these personnel. A semi-structured interview has been used as a data collection tool. To reach the reliability criterion, three methods have been used: control or validation by members, analytical comparisons, and the use of audit techniques. The data is collected according to the procedure. Based on the contextual theory, they have been analyzed in three stages of open, selective and selective (central) coding.

Findings: Based on the findings, factors such as: identification of the region, training and task description, command coordination, previous experiences of crisis management as causative conditions, media performance, relief and assistance situation as intervening conditions, use From the people with political influence as strategies, the size of the region and the volume of information, the quick delivery of relief items, coordination and information, resilience and social hope, and inspection and supervision as background conditions and the strengths and weaknesses of crisis management as consequences. has been

Conclusion: Earthquake crisis management is beneficial under various factors and conditions, one of the most important of which is the evaluation of plans and the use of experiences from previous incidents.