جغرافیا و روابط انسانی

جغرافیا و روابط انسانی

رتبه‌بندی عوامل طبیعی مؤثر در مکان‌یابی و توزیع فضایی سکونتگاه‌های قلعه‌ای با استفاده از مدل MABAC (مطالعه موردی: استان آذربایجان غربی)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه مدیریت جهانگردی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
2 گروه آموزشی باستان شناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، اردبیل ایران.
چکیده
الگوهای خاص حیات شکل گرفته بر روی کره زمین، ناشی از تعاملاتی است که بین انسان و محیط زیست وجود دارد. در همین راستا، پژوهش حاضر با تکیه بر داده‌های میدانی و اسنادی و با استفاده از مدل MABAC و GIS، به دنبال ارزیابی و رتبه‌بندی متغیرهای طبیعی مؤثر در مکان‌یابی و توزیع فضایی سکونتگاه‌های قلعه‌ای استان آذربایجان غربی در ایران است. به منظور تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها، پس از تشکیل پایگاه داده، توزیع فضایی سکونتگاه‌های قلعه‌ای شناسایی شده در رابطه با متغیرهای فاصله از رودخانه، سطوح ارتفاعی، شیب، جهت شیب، شکل زمین، طبقات اقلیمی، کاربری/پوشش گیاهی و نوع خاک ارزیابی و تحلیل شد. یافته‌های حاصل از تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها در قالب مدل MABAC نشان می‌دهد که فاصله از رودخانه، سطوح ارتفاعی و شکل زمین (دشتی و کوهستانی) بیشترین تأثیر را بر مکان‌یابی و توزیع فضایی سکونتگاه‌های قلعه‌ای در منطقه مورد مطالعه دارند و سایر متغیرهای طبیعی مانند طبقات اقلیمی، کاربری/پوشش گیاهی، نوع خاک، شیب و جهت شیب به ترتیب از نظر اهمیت و تأثیرگذاری در توزیع فضایی این سکونتگاه‌ها مؤثر بوده‌اند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Ranking of Effective Natural Factors in Location and Spatial Distribution of Castle Settlements by Using MABAC Model (Case Study: West Azerbaijan Province)

نویسندگان English

parviz pourkarimi 1
Karim Hajizadeh bastani 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Tourism Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Archaeology, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
چکیده English

The specific patterns of life formed on Earth are due to interactions that exist between man and the environment. In this regard, the present study is based on field and documentary data and using MABAC model and GIS, seeks to evaluate and rank the effective natural variables in the location and spatial distribution of castle settlements of west Azerbaijan province in Iran. In order to data analysis, after forming a database, the spatial distribution of identified castle settlements evaluated and analyzed in relation to variables of distance from the river, elevation levels, slope, aspect, landform, climatic classes, land use/vegetation and soil type. Findings obtained from the data analysis in the form of MABAC model show that distance from the river, elevation levels and landform (plain and mountainous) have the most effect on location and spatial distribution of castle settlements in studied region and other natural variables such as climatic classes, land use/ vegetation, soil type, slope and aspect have been effective in spatial distribution of these settlements in terms of importance and effective, respectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

castle settlement
natural factors
Iran
west Azerbaijan
MABAC model
Bai, H., Wilhelm Stanis, S. A., Kaczynski, A. T., & Besenyi, G. M. (2013). Perceptions of neighborhood park quality: Associations with physical activity and body mass index. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 45(Suppl. 1), S39–S48.
Baran, P. K., Smith, W. R., Moore, R. C., Floyd, M. F., Bocarro, J. N., Cosco, N. G., & Danninger, T. M. (2014). Park Use Among Youth and Adults: Examination of Individual, Social, and Urban Form Factors. Environment and Behavior, 46(6), 768–800.
Baycan-Levent, T., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Planning and management of urban green spaces in Europe: Comparative analysis. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 135(1), 1–12.
Byrne, J., & Sipe, N. (2010). Green and open space planning for urban consolidation—A review of literature and best practice. Urban research program issues paperBrisbane: Griffith University 11 March 2010. (ISBN978-1-921291-96-8).
Chen, J., Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C., Lin, C., Liu, F., Huang, Y., Huang, Q., Wang, M., Zhou, Q., Dong, J., 2021. Effects of personality, health and mood on satisfaction and quality  perception of urban mountain parks, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 63, 127210.
Chiesura, A. 2004. The role of urban parks for the sustainability of cities. Landscape and urban planning 68 (1), 129-138.
 
Cohen, D. A., Han, B., Derose, K. P., Williamson, S., Marsh, T., Rudick, J., & McKenzie, T. L. (2012). Neighborhood poverty, park use, and park-based physical activity in a Southern California city. Social Science & Medicine, 75(12), 2317–2325.
Colding, J. (2011). The role of ecosystem services in contemporary urban planning. In J. Niemelä (Vol. Ed.), Urban ecology: Patterns, processes and applications. 2011. Urban ecology: Patterns, processes and applications (pp. 228–237). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Costigan, S. A., Veitch, J., Crawford, D., Carver, A., & Timperio, A. (2017). A cross-sectional investigation of the importance of park features for promoting regular physical activity in parks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(11).
Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Osaka, calif: Sage.
Flick, U. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research, Sage Publications Inc. London.
Halkos, G., Leonti, A., Sardianou, E. 2021. Activities, motivations and satisfaction of urban parks visitors: A structural equation modeling analysis. Econ. Anal. Policy, 70, 502–513.
Hartig, T., Evans, GW., Jamner, LD., Davis, DS., Gärling, T. 2003. Tracking restoration innatural and urban field settings. J Environ Psychol, 23(2):109–23.
Hasani, M., Sakieh, Y., Khammar, S. 2017. Measuring satisfaction: Analyzing the relationships between sociocultural variables and functionality of urban recreational parks. Environment, development and sustainability, 19, 2577-2594
Hoffmann, M., Westermann, JR., Kowarid, I., van der Meer, E. 2012. Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents. Urban forestry & urban greening, 11 (3), 303-312.
Huai, S., Liu, S., Zheng, T.,  Van de Voorde, T. 2023. Are social media data and survey data consistent in measuring park visitation, park satisfaction, and their influencing factors? A case study in Shanghai, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 81, 127869.
Kaczynski, A. T., Potwarka, L. R., Smale, B. J. A., & Havitz, M. F. (2009). Association of Parkland proximity with neighborhood and park-based physical activity: Variations by gender and age. Leisure Sciences, 31(2), 174–191.
 
Kaczynski, A.T., Potwarka, L.R., Saelens, B.E., 2008. Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. Am. J. Public Health 98(8), 1451–1456
Kaplan, S., 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 15 (3),169–182.
Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology : a step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage Publications Ltd. London.
Larson, LR., Jennings, V., Cloutier, SA. 2016. Public parks and wellbeing in urban areas of the United States. PLoS ONE.11(4).
Maas, J., Perera, W., Verheij, RA., Groenewegen, PP., de Vries, S., Spreeuwenberg, P. 2006. Green space, urbanity, and health: How strong is the relation?. Journal of epidemiology & community health 60 (7), 587-592.
Malterud, K. (2001). The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet. 358:397-400.
Maniruzzaman, K.M., Alqahtany, A., Abou-korin, A., Al-shihri, F.S., 2021. An analysis of residents’ satisfaction with attributes of urban parks in Dammam city. Saudi Arab. Ain Shams Eng. J. 12, 3365–3374.
Neema, MN., Maniruzzaman, KM., Ohgai, A., 2013. Greenery-based model of green urbanism for developing a sustainable healthy livable city, 13th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications. p. 207-211.
Nielsen, TS., Hansen, KB. 2007. Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health & place 13 (4), 839-850.
Ojeda-Revah, L., Bojorquez, I., Carlos Osuna, J. 2017. How the legal framework for urban parks design affects user satisfaction in a Latin American city, Cities, 69, 12-19.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Osaka, CA: Sage.
Peters, K., Elands, B., Buijs, A., 2010. Social interactions in urban parks: stimulating social cohesion? Urban For. Urban Green. 9 (2), 93–100.
 
Roberts, H., Kellar, I., Conner, M., Gidlow, Ch., Kelly, B., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., McEachan, R. 2019. Associations between park features, park satisfaction and park use in a multi-ethnic deprived urban area, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 1-33.
Rung, A. L., Mowen, A. J., Broyles, S. T., & Gustat, J. (2011). The role of park conditions and features on park visitation and physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 8 Suppl 2(Suppl 2), S178-87.
Shores, K. A., & West, S. T. (2008). The relationship between built park environments and physical  activity in four park locations. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice : JPHMP, 14(3), e9-16.
Svendsen, ES., Campbell, LK., McMillen, HL. 2016. Stories, shrines, and symbols: Recognizing psycho-social-spiritual benefits of urban parks and natural areas. J Ethnobiol, 36(4):881–907.
Twohig-Bennett, C., Jones‏, A. 2018. The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes‏, Environmental research 166, 628-637.
Wu, W., Wang, M., Zhu, N., Zhang, W., Sun, H. 2019. Residential satisfaction about urban greenness: Heterogeneous effects across social and spatial gradients. Urban forestry & urban 

  • تاریخ دریافت 12 آذر 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 31 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 01 بهمن 1402